In recent weeks I have gone down a YouTube rabbit hole on the subject of the Shroud of Turin.
If you're not familiar with it, the Shroud is the most famous of religious relics. It is a 14-foot length of finely woven linen which has a faint full-bodied image of a man who apparently died of crucifixion. For centuries it has been promoted by the Church as the same burial cloth mentioned in all 4 Gospels.
I remember the Shroud being in the news sometimes during my formative years, but it dropped off my radar in the 1980s when scientists carbon dated a fragment of the cloth and announced it was a forgery.
They said it was made no earlier than the Middle Ages.
What remained a mystery was the method of creating the image. ALL the scientists agreed that no paint was involved. And real human blood was present. Furthermore, the image appears as a highly detailed photo negative and exhibits all of the wounds associated with Jesus' death: scourging, crown of thorns, nails through wrists and feet, and a spear wound through the ribs.
All of this was enough to keep the mystery alive - even though science had "proven" it a fake.
In the past year now, it seems the Shroud is "back in the news" - or at least there is renewed interest among podcasters.
And it turns out that the infamous carbon dating had been performed on a bit of the cloth which turned out to be a patch. The Shroud had survived a fire and someone had expertly repaired some of the burn holes with cotton thread.
The Shroud proper is linen. The carbon dating had been done on cotton fibers.
Recent developments have gotten less press than the carbon dating of the 80s. Newer (and less destructive) dating techniques have been used lately and they all confirm the material to be around 2,000 years old.
Plus, the fabric holds microscopic bits of pollen and dust native to Jerusalem.
Plus, the image has been proven to be 3-dimensional.
And the only working theory on what could produce such an image is this: a very brief but very intense flash of light.
Emanating from the body itself.
The Romans crucified quite a few individuals. But crowns of thorns were not standard practice. And as shameful as crucifixion was, most bodies were never claimed.
They didn't get wrapped in burial cloths. They got dumped in a mass grave.
And even if they did receive a proper burial, it would be very unusual for the dead man to be honored with a very expensive piece of cloth. (Though Joseph of Arimathea seemed to have the means.)
One commentator said that if you put all the evidence on two tables, the pile in favor of the Shroud of Turin being the authentic burial cloth of Jesus Himself would stretch to the ceiling while the table labeling it a fake would have nothing but the faulty carbon dating tests from the 80s.
Curiously, one of the Christian podcasters I watched held her hope of the Shroud's authenticity at arm's length, saying that she didn't need it to be real to bolster her faith. All she needed was to believe the word of God.
Fine, but the biblical accounts go out of their way to offer good evidence for the resurrection as a historical reality. And Jesus Himself made sure that the original disciples SAW Him, so that they would believe. Plus, He had no issue with granting Thomas' request to put his fingers in the nail holes even.
It's OK to have tangible, scientifically vetted evidence for the resurrection of Jesus.
Take the win.